<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Essay 1: Notes on Matt Zoller Seitz&#8217; ”Wes Anderson: The Substance Of Style&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2009/04/notes-on-matt-zoller-seitz-%e2%80%9dwes-anderson-the-substance-of-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2009/04/notes-on-matt-zoller-seitz-%e2%80%9dwes-anderson-the-substance-of-style/</link>
	<description>Rounding up the last of the 1,000 greatest films of all time                    (banner: The Far Country [1954, Anthony Mann])           Follow on Twitter: alsolikelife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:53:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alsolikelife</title>
		<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2009/04/notes-on-matt-zoller-seitz-%e2%80%9dwes-anderson-the-substance-of-style/comment-page-1/#comment-33441</link>
		<dc:creator>alsolikelife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=1526#comment-33441</guid>
		<description>Many thanks for doing this - it clarifies the essay a good deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for doing this &#8211; it clarifies the essay a good deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigRed</title>
		<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2009/04/notes-on-matt-zoller-seitz-%e2%80%9dwes-anderson-the-substance-of-style/comment-page-1/#comment-33436</link>
		<dc:creator>BigRed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=1526#comment-33436</guid>
		<description>Hola,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;not sure whether you want/need this but I went and translated some passages that seemed to ask to much of the automated systems :) Native German, which means you have to check the English, I am afraid...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;---------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the five parts of the Anderson-analysis he now traces the influences of other auteur styles on Anderson more systematically.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Part 5 is already in the title distinguished from the previous parts. “The prologue to The Royal Tenenbaum, annotated,” is the 6-minute sequence called.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zoller Seitz write an overabundance of comments, notes and analytical hints into the images of the opening sequence; especially in the soberly designating cases, the joins Anderson&#039;s own practice of captioning. Furthermore, as small pictures-in-picture, moving or nonmoving, parallels from other film-historical references are added (from Citizen Kane via movies by Hal Ashby to Bill Melendez). It is impossible to process this wealth in a single passage through Zoller Seitz&#039; film exercise; this in itself already hints at Wes Anderson&#039;s love of playful details and precisely localizable cinematic procedures like the emphasized-emphasizing camera movement, which Zoller Seitz calls &quot;emphatic dolly&quot;. Zoller Seitz&#039; annotated version orients itself - ironic in its excess, yet very earnestly focussed on its matter - on the critical annotation, which is known in literature in the case of classic editions, in which the apparatus often far exceeds the original text in length.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The effect of almost baroque richness is also created by the fact that in all intervations and overwritings of the image, two components are not touched: the timing and the soundtrack of Anderson&#039;s film. Seitz adds to the film no slow motion sequences, does not stop the picture, and does not interfere with the course of the perfectionist exposure of this wunderkind-family. His annotations, which scurry past in a fleetingness best described by the American adjective &quot;hilarious&quot;, are the erudite-astonished result of a fascinated, again and again the “rewind” button-pressing cinema enthusiasm. Repeat viewing for repeat viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola,</p>
<p>not sure whether you want/need this but I went and translated some passages that seemed to ask to much of the automated systems <img src='http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Native German, which means you have to check the English, I am afraid&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>In the five parts of the Anderson-analysis he now traces the influences of other auteur styles on Anderson more systematically.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Part 5 is already in the title distinguished from the previous parts. “The prologue to The Royal Tenenbaum, annotated,” is the 6-minute sequence called.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Zoller Seitz write an overabundance of comments, notes and analytical hints into the images of the opening sequence; especially in the soberly designating cases, the joins Anderson&#39;s own practice of captioning. Furthermore, as small pictures-in-picture, moving or nonmoving, parallels from other film-historical references are added (from Citizen Kane via movies by Hal Ashby to Bill Melendez). It is impossible to process this wealth in a single passage through Zoller Seitz&#39; film exercise; this in itself already hints at Wes Anderson&#39;s love of playful details and precisely localizable cinematic procedures like the emphasized-emphasizing camera movement, which Zoller Seitz calls &#8220;emphatic dolly&#8221;. Zoller Seitz&#39; annotated version orients itself &#8211; ironic in its excess, yet very earnestly focussed on its matter &#8211; on the critical annotation, which is known in literature in the case of classic editions, in which the apparatus often far exceeds the original text in length.</p>
<p>The effect of almost baroque richness is also created by the fact that in all intervations and overwritings of the image, two components are not touched: the timing and the soundtrack of Anderson&#39;s film. Seitz adds to the film no slow motion sequences, does not stop the picture, and does not interfere with the course of the perfectionist exposure of this wunderkind-family. His annotations, which scurry past in a fleetingness best described by the American adjective &#8220;hilarious&#8221;, are the erudite-astonished result of a fascinated, again and again the “rewind” button-pressing cinema enthusiasm. Repeat viewing for repeat viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
