Comments on: Notes from the NYU Film Conference, Pt. 5 – Q&A hosted by Girish Shambu

By: Free Vouchers

Free Vouchers — Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:36:43 +0000

I adore your articles AlOt!

By: Hologramholigan352

Hologramholigan352 — Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:35:20 +0000

One nice report you have written!

By: LawsonOrtauy8

LawsonOrtauy8 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:57:13 +0000

i would love to read more from you on this

regards
james orel
______________________________________________
watch one tree hill online | watch lost online | watch west wing

By: BattlesRuckerNi999

BattlesRuckerNi999 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:46:54 +0000

I subscribed to your blog when is the next post

Thanks
poly banger
______________________________________________
buy cheap warcraft accounts | wa state dui penalties | all natural skin care products

By: ABIBA99967052

ABIBA99967052 — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:27:56 +0000

I think a few pictures might help this blog

Have a nice day
paul krichoff
______________________________________________
Vacation Homes Sonoma | cheap aion online item | buy cheap aion pl

By: David Peck

David Peck — Wed, 21 May 2008 05:31:20 +0000

Hey, I licensed my film to this company, they pay actual cash and are super easy to deal with. They are generally interested in high quality comedies.

Thanks,
David

http://www.minimovie.com

By: alsolikelife

alsolikelife — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:00:56 +0000

I agree it’s impossible to separate the two as they feed each other, but still it’s refreshing to assert that art can stand for something independent of its advancement of a sociopolitical agenda. Otherwise David Walsh would be the ideal film critic.

By: HarryTuttle

HarryTuttle — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:56:03 +0000

I’d agree to art vs. agenda, but how do you distinguish cinema-politics and real-world-politics? To me, the cause of cinema is hardly “social” in a political sense (or it’s only a confusing metaphor).
The “cause of cinema” maybe suits Straub-Huillet, but then they have a real world agenda.

By: alsolikelife

alsolikelife — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:24:14 +0000

I’d would say, promoting thinking about cinema as an artform rather than a subset of a socio-political agenda, such that it becomes its own political movement, advancing the cause of cinema. My own personal example would be Henri Langlois.

By: HarryTuttle

HarryTuttle — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:36:08 +0000

“cinema activism on behalf of cinema itself as a political or social movement, as opposed to being a function of political or social purposes”

What does this mean?