Comments on: 940. Je vous salue, Marie / Hail Mary (1984, Jean-Luc Godard)

By: Internet Security

Internet Security — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:53:03 +0000

While you are conducting your service tonight, other Catholics will be picketing Facets Multimedia, which is showing the film. You have indicated that you believe picketing is not a wise choice; that it only draws attention to a film.

By: China Tour

China Tour — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:52:42 +0000

Great post, what you said is really helpful to me. I can't agree with you anymore. I have been talking with my friend about, he though it is really interesting as well. Keep up with your good work, I would come back to you.

By: Penvronius Miles Cambrensis

Penvronius Miles Cambrensis — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 01:00:05 +0000

I think many Catholics would be unable to accept such a presentation of Mary in this way. My thoughts when I saw the film broadcast some years ago were in the main how any man could restrain himself from wanting to make love to so beautiful a woman – without becoming seriously psychologically damaged – unless he had zero sex drive – which may be possible – for as the disparaged Kinsey report showed – sexual outlet or expression is the one area of human activity where individual differences are abnormally different – some persons would like relations several times a day and others once a year. Such variability in other dimensions of human experience is not evident – but what does Godard achieve except to perhaps to show the tensions of pregnancy – there seems to be no loving anticipation of the birth of a child – this is only a burden not a joy – to capture the presence of God in this he has definitely not achieved. However it is represented, Mary is essentially the revelation of the Motherhood of God – through Mary God is able to express all the qualities of the feminine which humans hold dear. Thus in portraying Mary even as a modern person one must portray the sublime – there seemed to be no transcendent quality to this film – it is ultimately not leading to the joy of the incarnation – Deus Nobiscum – God becoming one with us – sharing our existence to raise our expectations of humanitarian goodness – but to
show only the drugery of human existence. To be human is also to be divine – that is what the incarnation implies and this was absent.

By: vierge Marie

vierge Marie — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:28:53 +0000

cool,j e te remercie beaucoup pour kes vidéos

By: vierge Marie

vierge Marie — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:25:08 +0000

je teremercie pour les vidéo s:)

By: vierge Marie

vierge Marie — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:21:13 +0000

hello, j’aimev beaucoup ton blog on yb trouve souvent quelques perles. e me demandais pourquoi avoie fait cette précisio : it has been picked up by an independent concern

By: numerologie

numerologie — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:55:33 +0000

génial, je ter emercie pour ces vidzos !

By: numerologie

numerologie — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:51:06 +0000

je te fremercie pour les vidéos:)

By: numerologie

numerologie — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:46:34 +0000

Hello, cettee précision est pasforcément utile : although not listed in the menu they were removable on my system … en tout cas, ttrès bon bilelt ! @+

By: alsolikelife

alsolikelife — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:28:15 +0000

“clinical and tender” sounds right for post-”every man for himself” Godard — if there’s a pathos to be found in the cerebral then you can find it for certain in Notre Musique, In Praise of Love, Passion, Nouvelle Vague, Forever Mozart, and most definitely Histoires du Cinema (probably my favorite of the bunch)

so Matt do you prefer his earlier works like Charles?

David your recent post is worthy of Godard, or Errol Morris’ Times pieces (which you reference).