<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 924. The Heiress (1949, William Wyler)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2007/05/924-the-heiress-1949-william-wyler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2007/05/924-the-heiress-1949-william-wyler/</link>
	<description>Rounding up the last of the 1,000 greatest films of all time                    (banner: The Far Country [1954, Anthony Mann])           Follow on Twitter: alsolikelife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:02:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2007/05/924-the-heiress-1949-william-wyler/comment-page-1/#comment-36161</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=132#comment-36161</guid>
		<description>Hm, actually, THE HEIRESS won Oscars for Best Actress, Best Music and Best Costume Design too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, actually, THE HEIRESS won Oscars for Best Actress, Best Music and Best Costume Design too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wyler s</title>
		<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2007/05/924-the-heiress-1949-william-wyler/comment-page-1/#comment-21972</link>
		<dc:creator>wyler s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=132#comment-21972</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting than ... ???To play de Havilland??s emotionally distant father wyler turned to Ralph ...http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=132Wyler&amp;aposs? Instant Bouillonhttp://www.wylers.com/Wyler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaWyler is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting than &#8230; ???To play de Havilland??s emotionally distant father wyler turned to Ralph &#8230;http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=132Wyler&#38;aposs? Instant Bouillonhttp://www.wylers.com/Wyler &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaWyler is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alsolikelife</title>
		<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2007/05/924-the-heiress-1949-william-wyler/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>alsolikelife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=132#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>Thanks Joe -- your take on Wyler is a very fair one and it keeps me honest.  I think my auteurist upbringing has hardwired me to look down on Wyler, but the fact is that he made a lot of great movies, and I&#039;d include The Heiress as one of them.  

I enjoyed Roman Holiday quite a lot too when I saw it, partly because I screened it with my students in China a decade ago and they absolutely fell in love with it, no doubt for Audrey Hepburn.  All those adjectives you use to describe Wyler are spot on, he&#039;s quintessential tasteful director (to a fault perhaps?).  You can&#039;t say that Wyler isn&#039;t manipulative in his own way (as is Hitchcock) -- the real matter that would separate him or Hitch from the chaff of today&#039;s schlock is whether there&#039;s something going on that informs or gives a deeper sense of purpose to those cinematic manipulations imposed on the audience.  Million Dollar Baby is as manipulative as hell (how can&#039;t it be with Haggis as screenwriter) but Eastwood manages to give the melodrama a feeling that is unmistakably genuine and unmistakably his own -- a sense of his patriarchal protectivist stance towards the world falling apart at the seams.  

Anyway have no fear, there&#039;s a lot of great stuff out now, not even just on technological grounds but in terms of feeling -- it may just be that human feelings are different than they were 60 years ago, for better or worse.  Two films I&#039;m interested in seeing that seem to touch on genuine human feelings are AWAY FROM HER and KNOCKED UP -- hope I get a chance to see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joe &#8212; your take on Wyler is a very fair one and it keeps me honest.  I think my auteurist upbringing has hardwired me to look down on Wyler, but the fact is that he made a lot of great movies, and I&#8217;d include The Heiress as one of them.  </p>
<p>I enjoyed Roman Holiday quite a lot too when I saw it, partly because I screened it with my students in China a decade ago and they absolutely fell in love with it, no doubt for Audrey Hepburn.  All those adjectives you use to describe Wyler are spot on, he&#8217;s quintessential tasteful director (to a fault perhaps?).  You can&#8217;t say that Wyler isn&#8217;t manipulative in his own way (as is Hitchcock) &#8212; the real matter that would separate him or Hitch from the chaff of today&#8217;s schlock is whether there&#8217;s something going on that informs or gives a deeper sense of purpose to those cinematic manipulations imposed on the audience.  Million Dollar Baby is as manipulative as hell (how can&#8217;t it be with Haggis as screenwriter) but Eastwood manages to give the melodrama a feeling that is unmistakably genuine and unmistakably his own &#8212; a sense of his patriarchal protectivist stance towards the world falling apart at the seams.  </p>
<p>Anyway have no fear, there&#8217;s a lot of great stuff out now, not even just on technological grounds but in terms of feeling &#8212; it may just be that human feelings are different than they were 60 years ago, for better or worse.  Two films I&#8217;m interested in seeing that seem to touch on genuine human feelings are AWAY FROM HER and KNOCKED UP &#8212; hope I get a chance to see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe armenio</title>
		<link>http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/2007/05/924-the-heiress-1949-william-wyler/comment-page-1/#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>joe armenio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsolikelife.com/shooting/?p=132#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>i like wyler a lot, i think because he represents that &quot;cold bazanian ideal,&quot; as you say, of the &quot;style without style&quot;; i can&#039;t cite any specific examples but in &quot;the heiress&quot; i remember being impressed by the subtlety of his framings and re-framings, the play of emotions across three or four characters&#039; faces and bodies within a single shot, which seemed to convey the really fraught and neurotic psychology of the story in a meticulous and effective and unflashy way. i have only seen a small percentage of wyler&#039;s films but i think it is my favorite so far, and that includes &quot;the best years of our lives,&quot; which i also like a lot. like you say the narrative is a little pat; the many hesitations and passive-aggressive manipulations of the james novel are flattened out into a more dramtically conventional arc. 

i recently watched wyler&#039;s &quot;roman holiday,&quot; which i was prepared to really dislike, but it won me over with its intelligence; this analogy might not hold up to any scrutiny but i was being all curmudgeonly and things-ain&#039;t-what-they-used-to-be by telling a friend that &quot;roman holiday&quot; is to a current oscar-bait-type film (a ron howard joint, say, or &quot;crash&quot;) what david straithern&#039;s ed murrow is to joe mccarthy in &quot;good night, and good luck&quot;; wyler is stoic,intelligent, articulate, dignified above all else, while yuor current oscar-bait is manipulative, blubbering, and loony, desperate to be liked and insisting on blubbering lunacy as proof of authenticity. dignity wins the battle but blubbering lunacy has won the war. i say this as someone who is deeply suspicious of aesthetic conservatism or vague fondness for golen ages, but it really does seem to me that there has been a real decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like wyler a lot, i think because he represents that &#8220;cold bazanian ideal,&#8221; as you say, of the &#8220;style without style&#8221;; i can&#8217;t cite any specific examples but in &#8220;the heiress&#8221; i remember being impressed by the subtlety of his framings and re-framings, the play of emotions across three or four characters&#8217; faces and bodies within a single shot, which seemed to convey the really fraught and neurotic psychology of the story in a meticulous and effective and unflashy way. i have only seen a small percentage of wyler&#8217;s films but i think it is my favorite so far, and that includes &#8220;the best years of our lives,&#8221; which i also like a lot. like you say the narrative is a little pat; the many hesitations and passive-aggressive manipulations of the james novel are flattened out into a more dramtically conventional arc. </p>
<p>i recently watched wyler&#8217;s &#8220;roman holiday,&#8221; which i was prepared to really dislike, but it won me over with its intelligence; this analogy might not hold up to any scrutiny but i was being all curmudgeonly and things-ain&#8217;t-what-they-used-to-be by telling a friend that &#8220;roman holiday&#8221; is to a current oscar-bait-type film (a ron howard joint, say, or &#8220;crash&#8221;) what david straithern&#8217;s ed murrow is to joe mccarthy in &#8220;good night, and good luck&#8221;; wyler is stoic,intelligent, articulate, dignified above all else, while yuor current oscar-bait is manipulative, blubbering, and loony, desperate to be liked and insisting on blubbering lunacy as proof of authenticity. dignity wins the battle but blubbering lunacy has won the war. i say this as someone who is deeply suspicious of aesthetic conservatism or vague fondness for golen ages, but it really does seem to me that there has been a real decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
